Just a bit of fun… as Conservative MP for South West Surrey and Secretary of State, Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport and friend of the Murdoch’s Jeremy Hunt unleashes Olympic terror with a bell end.
That would have caused all kinds of embarrassment at the subs desk and the picture editor would probably have had to consider its position. I imagine that some advertisers might also be reflecting on their onward positions regarding placing revenues with the paper.
I’d imagine that NewsCorp or Mr Murdoch’s own lawyers would have gone in hard stating that Mr Murdoch certainly does not have a wide face and, therefore, cannot be used to illustrate this story.
So, it’s a damned good idea all round that The Independent didn’t get its picture wrong in this story and used a picture of Richard Nixon instead.
“For government officials in Huili, a distinctly modest county in a rural corner of south-west China, attracting national media coverage would normally seem a dream come true. Unfortunately, their moment in the spotlight was not so welcome: mass ridicule over what may well be one of the worst-doctored photographs in internet history.”
Betrand RussellIn which the glorious Betrand Russell gives his views on the validity or otherwise of Christian belief.
The, even then, old philosopher has a twinkle in his eye as he answers questions on why he isn’t a Christian. Using an onslaught of what is apparently logic and rational thought he leads the interviewer through his reasoning in a few minutes.
Watch the end, however, to see how is also quite capable of pulling a ‘fact’ or statistic out of the air with no basis in actual empirical evidence. He’s almost smiling when he does it.
Of course, as I report this I remember BR’s quote:
“A stupid man’s report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.”
Zombie Dragon Skirt Ball of Duty Press Release: LONDON JUNE 21 2011
UK developer, GasheadAuGrrr Games, is proud and excited to announce the exciting news that Zombie Dragon Skirt Ball War of Duty is now in development for all major gaming platforms.
An innovative mix of volleyball, the Koreastahn War and Dragon fighting, for the first time ever, Dragon Skirt Ball War of Duty brings Zombies into the fray.
A family is washed ashore during the first Koreastani War and finds themselves set upon by [please name them properly in the press release] Enemy Insurgents riding in infected dragons. The familiy’s only hope of escape is the play volleyball at high speed and with few clothes.
“We are excited to bring this platforming, FPS, RPG, MMORPG breakwatershed moment in modern video gaming to [insert platforms that we've signed up to] history going forward. We feel it’s a flagpost marquee moment for all stakeholders,” commented deputy vice president in charge of Gamification Studios at GasheadAUGrrr, Mr Gregg Arnie Stokcton Head. UK Games Development Company Dragon Skirt Ball War of Duty is due for release in Fall 2012.
I am thinking of asking Stephen King or Simon Pegg… or both.
Yes, I‚Äôm going to ask them to use their actual talent to create some text that I can use to sell my book, Dead Idea. The text will be loosely based on my book. The text will be ‘leaked’ online in order to convince people that my book (Dead Idea) is creatively rich and interesting. The text will also convince people I have the talent and that the content of my book will be up to the same standard.
I’m also going to ask my pal Paul to write some slow, mawkish music using his oboe and the D-minor chord. I am going to include this as an MP3.
Simon Pegg & Stephen King
My new book ‚Äì called Dead Idea – is using some tried and tested ideas all of which have been imagined and creatively realised by people way more talented and original than I am.
It‚Äôs a book (called Dead Idea) about zombies attacking people who aren‚Äôt zombies yet but will be if they don’t beat the zombies. It’s set in a football stadium or a nightclub or somewhere.
If I’m really honest, I’ve not really put that much thought into writing it. There are no novel nor interesting angles or techniques in there. I mean, why bother? It’s not as if I have the talent or the inclination to provide any insight or originality. It’s not as if people want those kind of disruptive problems.
Interviews for Dead Idea
Of course, when I’m interviewed about it I’m going to talk about “metaphors”, “analogies”, “zeitgeisty moments”, “modern moral morays” and “insightful commentary”.
I’m also going to talk about “a bit of fun”, “awesome bloody madness”, “game-changing genre reboot” and “recapturing the adrenalin of zombie lit from back in the day”.
They have free reign, well near as damn it. I’ve asked them to make sure that they “Pep it up a bit. Make it emotional but not so emotional that it actually forces the target market to assess their emotions in the world outside of schlock and awesomeness.
Dead Idea – Remember How You Felt!
The idea is to evoke enough emotion in the reader so that, in this age of fragmented media and information overload, they remember the name of my new book – Dead Idea ‚Äì and they don’t notice the weary ideas and pedestrian writing when it finally rolls out. By the time it rolls out I want my consumers to defend Dead Idea like it was their own child about to be murdered in its holiday bed.
Ideally the consumer will confuse the text written for me with my own actual work.
You see, I need people to remember, I do not want them to think about Dead Idea. Jesus Christ! If they actually think about Dead Idea and the amount of money I’m asking them to fork o over for my bland rehashing of an idea that’s been done, if I may say so, to undeath – well, I’m fucked.
Importantly I need them to start talking about the name of my book (that’s Dead Idea) now so that I can convince retailers to buy in stock before the reviews are out.
My problem is, however, that I’ve not finished Dead Idea (the name of my new book) and the bits I have finished are, frankly, so utterly uninspiring that I can’t even get my girlfriend or any of my friends to show much interest in it.
So, I get someone else to use their work to convince potential clients that my work is worth buying.
My problem – although I trust both Messrs Pegg and Mr King’s talents – is that the glut of zombie popular culture that I’m attempting to extract the last few fruits of profit from requires a Unique Selling Point. Hence the dead child.
Dead Idea
Sure some people’s children have actually died, but we cannot sacrifice the creative force for the minority. Sure, I could ask Messrs Pegg and King to ensure that the dead child appears peripherally rather than right up front but, honestly, where’s the emotional impact?
Honestly? If it was down to me I’d use a dead zombie puppy or kitten but I can’t. My target audience likes puppies and kittens. More people have loved and lost pets than they have children. More of my market has had dead pets than they’ve parented live children for fuck’s sake! Lol.
Using a dead kitten as the key focus, right up front, with no warning, it will not have the same impact. So, I’ve asked Messrs Pegg and King to ensure some form of infanticide occurs from the off.
Real art does that, and you can defend real art against, well, nearly anything. It’s bloody Teflon is real art.
Real artists and works of art such as, well, none leaps immediately to mind, have used dead kids staring you in the face from the first paragraph.
So, I don’t see why the advert for Dead Idea that I’m getting other more talented people to produce and that does not reflect the actual work I’m producing should be judged differently.
And what harm is there in it?
Dead Idea – a Book
People like zombie stuff, that’s for sure. Who wouldn’t? It’s an easy enough trope to manipulate. It is certainly scary in a comforting way. It has also created rule-sets: “Fast zombie vs Slow zombie” etc. The knowledge of these ‘rules’ provides a sense of community among those more inclined to yell, “Fuck you, ya bucket of cum!” than “I’d not thought about it like that, let’s have a talk”.
Zombies are certainly less likely to encourage actual analysis than using the homeless, the disabled, the poor or terrorists as “the other”. The problem is, however, that by now even the most dull-minded of consumers are starting to notice the constant repetition of a Zombies, Zombies and more Zombies.
Well, maybe not the most dull-minded. Certainly not those consumers who are abjectly cowardly in raising an opinion that might see them as “funless” or “just saying it for effect”, and they’re my market. I love those guys.
So, the zombie cult remains profitable and its death still some months off. At least that’s what I’m telling my publisher. I mean, it is still quite possible to elicit cries of “Awesome!” and “Hellz yeah!” and “Genuine LOL” from the Idiocricy by slapping the following onto the Internet and using some pre-seen footage, probably in slow motion and probably with that mawkish music.
“Zombie My Little Pony!”
“Zombie Mario Meets Zombie Obama!”
“Zombie Cake!”
“Zombie Libyan Uprising!”
Don’t Forget! Dead Idea! Coming Soon!
So, I hope that Messrs Pegg or King decide to take me up on my request to enable me to hitchhike their talent. I only want about 400 words out of one of them ‚Äì plus Paul‚Äôs oboe noodling. As long as they remember to ensure that a child dies in there ‚Äì a zombie child who isn‚Äôt actually a zombie at the end of the backwards piece ‚Äì then I reckon that I can, like a pimp for the soul – solicit just enough emotion to make this shit stick long enough for word of mouth to take off.
Some people might complain though. This is not the end of the world, this merely calls for a damage limitation exercise. For that I can trust to the kind of people who are unable to see an advertisement when it’s crammed into their gullets like corn into a French goose. This inability comes from the delicious fact that these people have already committed to the idea that their hobby is actually their world. These are the kind of wonderful consumers who will defend my 400 words of trope-repeating, wearisome tripe against all-comers.
In order to help these fantastically sticky fans along, I’ve already got some arguments lined up for them:
1) It’s just some text, get over it.
2) If this was a poem and not a schlock novel then you’d say it was art!
3) It’s just some fun, get a sense of humour.
4) It’s not EVEN a real CHILD FFS!
5) Why don’t you think about the real dead kids in Africa?
6) Didn’t you hear the music? Didn’t you see it was to be read from back to front? Are you stupid?
7) Do you hate novels? Are you a hater?
8) Why are you trying to censor stuff? That’s what the Nazis/Communists/Democrats did/do/want to do.
9) Just because you felt bad about the dead child being used to sell a product doesn’t mean you’ve got to bum me out by making me feel bad. STFU!
10) Awwwww are you butt-hurt? Get a life loooza!
And don’t forget… the absolute killer rhetorical response, it’s Number 11, it’s:
11) So, they used a dead child in that advert for killing kids in road accidents!!! Did you object to that too!!! Haterz gonna hate… jus’ sayin’. Piece out.
I’ve been sent this lovely old piece of the Internet today by AN_D_K and it made me smile. It derives from a conversation late last night regarding the true uses of the Internet: pix of cute cats, pr0n and arguments about who the best captain of the Enterprise was.
Simple answers: (a) Captain Christopher Pike was the best question (b) Anything with Scott Bakula in is the worst.
Normal no-sadly geek service will be restored shortly.
Sarah Silverman talks to Bill Maher about why her appearance at the TED conference, curated and invented by my ex-boss and Future Publishing founder Chris Anderson, was met with disapprobation.
To be exact, Mr Anderson tweeted that Ms Silverman was “God awful”. The video of her performance was never aired. Now, I have not only got a connection to this by dint of the fact that Chris Anderson was a former boss. I was also the father of a seriously disabled child who died in 2005.
There’s been some misunderstanding about this post.
I used to work at the Australian Caption Centre. Once upon a time a copy of South Park came in featuring a character called Timmy – you know the guy, cerebral palsy. So, rather than get me to caption the episode, I was taken aside by some really good-willed people. They were sure that I’d be offended by the sight of an actual disabled person being portrayed in a satirical cartoon.
I watched the episode and was happy as happy could be that Timmy was portrayed as a character. Not an evil genius. Not a pitiable caricature (thanks Nick Cage). Not a ‘Token’. Timmy was there. More people were offended for me and my daughter than I was. More people were made uncomfortable by a home truth than I was. The home truth? Heavily disabled people exist.
I think that Sarah Silverman’s thought-catalyst (as I’m sure the people at TED would say over the sound of heads nodding at the same speed as headbangers at a Slayer gig) offended people on that basis. Also on the basis that, yes, there are a lot of kids out there already. Yes, the retarded ones need love too. Yes, in a great number of cases, such as mine, those kids will die before their parents do. Those are real thoughts.
In short: I actually agree with Sarah Silverman on this one. Thanks for bringing it up.
PS: why were you so rubbish when you came to England though?
Following on from my previous post about the fact you can add “…Of Blood!” to nearly anything and come up with a Cult Movie, I’d like to introduce the equally as good “…Of the Damned!’ with this Aussie ‘classic’ from 1975.
The title says most of what you need to know. It’s an inn, it’s for the damned. There’s sex, violence, mystery and, of course given that it’s an Aussie flick made in the 1970s, it’s got John Meillon.
Meillion gave an absolutely cracking performance as the tragically foolhardy Sir John Kerr in The Dismissal.
So now, Inn of the Damned! “A big picture set in a Big Country”.